Rape, Every 5 years old’s Fantasy?????

You are taught in Journalism Class that the intent of your story should always be on the last line.
“A lot of things went wrong in my case,” she said.

If you any of you can tell me who the Observer reported said this back in October, 2008, then you are ahead of the curve.

The answer is Crystal Gail Mangum, the discredited accuser in the Duke lacrosse case when the Observer was helping her with the publicity of her new book.

You know the case where those rich guys raped and defiled that innocent little girl selling cookies… oh wait maybe that was not the full story and perhaps a District Attorney and the media all got it wrong.

But now we have the ultimate case to clear up the misconception that the Media is biased. An Assistant Professor with Duke University is selling sex favors with his 5 year old adopted child on the internet. Let the information flow and tell us all the details. You know like we heard about during that last case from Duke.

Oh well nothing from the Observer, like this guy and his male partner had adopted two small children and this five year old was black while these guys are white. Funny that these two lived in a commune which favors lets say an alternate lifestyle, which we assume means getting kids to adopt and then we assume to drug them with cough medicine and then when you get tired of abusing them yourself invite a bunch of other men to come and abuse him or abuse him and let a bunch of old perverts watch. Still you would think this information would have come to the Observer’s pages but they were too busy getting the new and caring Observer off the ground or worrying about Chicken Workers.

Maybe the fact we have not heard for a fact that this kid was raped is the key. The Observer is trying to keep it on the down low. If you do not know what the down low means then this might help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down-low

The Charlotte Observer they care more about chicken pluckers than five year olds who get attacked by these sick ole f………. Ok so lets not say the word but it is not sad that a once respectable news source has become this watered down stock at less than a buck or so operation in just a short time.

Rape we think is not on the mind of any 5 year old, nor is molestation, drugging or all that other stuff we adults even think are reprehensible, what about it Observer are you going to report the news or not?

See how I used the last line to make my point that we want the full news and not watered down stuff. Oh wait this would be the last line and the point I want to make is above. How about if I repeat it? What about is Observe are you going to rport the news or not?